ESR - User: wikkkkietman

<< prev next >>

Live Streams

LoL Riot Games (55871 viewers)
Dota2 4cejkee (613 viewers)
GG DraQu_ (168 viewers)
CS ESL CS:GO (151 viewers)
GG CoolleR (80 viewers)
SC2 ESL SC2 (65 viewers)
GG xronya (22 viewers)
Q3 DefragLive (6 viewers)

and 1 more

Scheduled Listings

more...

wikkkkietman's votes

Who are the most annoying ESR users? (217)

BLUEman

Latest Threads

Latest Comments

News maxter wins 11th Estoty title at Duel To... (2)
News AGENT, Fog and k1llsen sweep 250 FPS S6 ... (1)
News Site summary for week ending 23 Oct (0)
News AGENT wins Frontier One Map Cup #1 (0)
News A few Steam updates (0)

more...

Latest Forum Threads

Q3 What is the definition of cess? (7)
Q3 Spiterbot Version .50 RC9 (4)
GG Visit to Tokyo japan (18)
GG [Looking beta testers] Dinoblast — defr... (4)
GG LG Train - lightning gun tracking traine... (0)

more...

Latest Journals

Ai Bot (13) by cloned
we meat again (1177) by aggnog
QuakeChampions FPS (15) by WedbulL
500. (32) by pizz
journal and photos (41) by tom

more...

Hot Topics

News maxter wins 11th Estoty title at Duel To... (2)
News phaze beats Keltz twice to win EGB QC Cu... (1)
News proZaC and baksteen discuss Quake's futu... (1)
News AGENT, Fog and k1llsen sweep 250 FPS S6 ... (1)
News FURIA wins Thunderpick with 3-2 victory ... (0)

more...

ESR Virtual Betting

Lamur
E$ 238,131

E$ 176,304 omek
E$ 129,238 fazz
E$ 61,723 lithz
E$ 58,635 nsx0r
E$ 57,658 nk121

List · Edit · iMsg

wikkkkietman

wikkkkietman
Posts: 42
Popularity: Nobody (0%)

Level: Regular

Registered: 22 Jan 2002

Email: [email protected]

Full Name: Kuster, Ramon

Age: 39

Location: Paramaribo

iM Replies: Y

Timezone: America/Paramaribo

Country: Suriname

Avatar: geek

Homepage: www•esreality•com

Config: None uploaded

Drafts: 0

Judgements: 240 made, 124 received

Bets Placed: 99 (Rank: 267)

E$ Money: 500 (500 available)

E$ Savings: 4212

Buddied by: 16 users

Last Login: 5 Dec 2022

Theme: Custom theme

Journal

Check my dl speed, you'll flip! (127 comments)

( Journal: HW OT)

Posted by wikkkkietman @ 11:28 UTC, 20 August 2003 - iMsg

Check it out, I love 100mbit! This was downloaded from sogamed.

Edited by wikkkkietman at 12:01 GMT, 20th Aug 2003 - 45716 Hits

<< Comment #1 @ 12:53 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

ramon

Who approved that pic? it's obviously meant to torment the majority of download users on this site. :P

<< Comment #2 @ 12:59 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

fzz`

whoa
thats fast :)

<< Comment #3 @ 13:24 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

primax

<< Comment #4 @ 13:28 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (iproxy1.kennisnet.nl)

I hate you :P

<< Comment #5 @ 13:40 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

grimbob

Not bad, I have seen better

<< Comment #101 @ 16:27 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

mentalist - Reply to #5

shut up u twat

<< Comment #6 @ 14:24 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Morba

yer, i got 100mb in work, ownage tbh on quiet night shifts.
during the day tho theres like 2500 ppl on the lan, and dl speed drops to about 300k/sec :/

<< Comment #33 @ 17:30 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

dreg - Reply to #6

OH NO, THE HORROR!!!!

i only get 125kb/s:<

<< Comment #37 @ 22:49 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Morba - Reply to #33

lol, thats on 1mb cable tho, so its pretty good :D

<< Comment #41 @ 23:20 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

dreg - Reply to #37

i know :<

<< Comment #43 @ 01:33 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Morba - Reply to #41

beter than my 60k/sec on 576k adsl :/

really need to call nildram and have 1mb sorted out :]

<< Comment #97 @ 12:15 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

tewic - Reply to #37

Back in 2004 when I had 1mbit it ran around 145-150kb/s all the time.. so pls, 125kb/s is bad :P

<< Comment #111 @ 18:33 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

danny - Reply to #97

look at timestamps...

<< Comment #112 @ 23:35 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

dreg - Reply to #97

lol i got 10mbit now, upgrading to 20mbit... same line \o/

<< Comment #7 @ 14:45 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

hrm, that would fill my main hard disk in 1079.1 seconds. sux.

<< Comment #8 @ 15:01 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman

Muhahaha, evil, very evil, wait I'll give u a much faster pic!

<< Comment #74 @ 14:54 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

GoTch4 - Reply to #8

who wants to download CS demos anyway?

<< Comment #75 @ 16:24 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #74

I download q3 movies!

<< Comment #9 @ 15:09 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman

Muhaha!

Edited by wikkkkietman at 15:10 GMT, 20th Aug 2003

<< Comment #26 @ 09:15 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

led - Reply to #9

you could hold ALT and then print screen, this way you just copy the window that you've selected.

<< Comment #32 @ 16:38 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #26

Thanks mate.

<< Comment #10 @ 16:18 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

YaoiSama

i've d/led a movie in 13mb/s on 100mbit... THATS ownage then again, who cares really?

<< Comment #12 @ 16:46 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #10

With what kind of hard drive?

<< Comment #13 @ 18:03 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

YaoiSama - Reply to #12

why does that matter? 100mbit = 10mb/s

a 30gb 5700rpm....

<< Comment #24 @ 23:22 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-25.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #13

100mbit = 0.000012mb/s

100Mbit = 100Mb/s

100Mbit = 12.5MB/s

<< Comment #25 @ 08:10 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

YaoiSama - Reply to #24

may i ask why you gave 3 answers to the speed of 100mbit? it sure as hell isn't 0.000012mb/s and its not 100mb/s either.... please tell me the point

<< Comment #27 @ 09:38 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-119.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #25

I'm sorry, I made a typo.

100mbit = 0.000012mB/s

100Mbit = 100Mb/s

100Mbit = 12.5MB/s

hi, honey.

<< Comment #29 @ 13:43 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

OverFlouh - Reply to #27

you forgot 100Mbit = 100 Mbit ;)

without the overhead you get about 10-11mb/s, you never get the full 12.5.
you can get close in an ideal setup (small lan with all high quality components) though.

<< Comment #48 @ 10:13 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

nV - Reply to #27

hi kdawg

<< Comment #31 @ 14:03 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

dys50r - Reply to #24

what does the small "m" represent?

<< Comment #39 @ 23:18 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-109.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #31

millibits? :)

<< Comment #34 @ 18:25 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

rev^ - Reply to #24

Please can we get this horrible excuse for a human being off the site? His pathetic attempts to appear superior are very, very irritating. IP ban?

<< Comment #36 @ 20:34 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

zet - Reply to #34

not likely

<< Comment #38 @ 23:18 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-119.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #34

please, can we be any more ignorant? "IP ban"
wee, that is cute. I am so superior! oh yes.
but the funny thing is that I am.

<< Comment #44 @ 01:35 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Morba - Reply to #38

k-dawg, im on usb adsl atm (poor me), would a router be better for my ping ? any recommendations for good ones ?

<< Comment #45 @ 02:54 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-109.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #44

no. no.

<< Comment #49 @ 12:32 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Morba - Reply to #45

so why do ppl rate routers over usb modems then :/

what about a pci modem ?

<< Comment #71 @ 02:23 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

eidola - Reply to #49

They don't, they rate ethernet over USB, a router is only useful if you want to share your connection with other computers.

<< Comment #72 @ 04:06 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Morba - Reply to #71

which i will be once i sort me lappy out, that will be wireless tho.

<< Comment #11 @ 16:26 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Toronto-O.P.P

omfg ownage

the most i got was 300k : (

and when i get 300k download i go crazy :P

<< Comment #14 @ 18:46 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Drakeer - Reply to #11

The most I've gotten is 150k :(

<< Comment #16 @ 20:19 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Powerer - Reply to #14

:D
my conn: 512/128 kpbs dsl so-> 65Kbps dl.

<< Comment #15 @ 20:13 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

dirky

whats the need for 100mb fs, gready swedes

<< Comment #17 @ 20:29 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #15

I ain't a Swede, I'm Surinamese! They both start with an "s" though.

<< Comment #113 @ 11:35 UTC, 18 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

luKrek - Reply to #15

downloading DVDR's -_-

<< Comment #116 @ 21:22 UTC, 18 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

dirky - Reply to #113

The scary thing here is that post with awful English was made four years ago not far from the actual day itself!

<< Comment #117 @ 08:21 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

luKrek - Reply to #116

I just love bringing old shit up.

<< Comment #18 @ 21:33 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

D i M a

I get 50MB/s on localhost.

<< Comment #19 @ 21:35 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

koei

i got 100123 gb/s

very interesting

<< Comment #109 @ 16:22 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

neuron - Reply to #19

Thats's insane mate

<< Comment #20 @ 22:43 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

sonic '

I got 15k/s once on kazaa.

<< Comment #21 @ 23:12 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

jonte

lolz, sk insider´!!! traitor! :]]]]]]]]

<< Comment #22 @ 23:13 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-109.cha.bellsouth.net)

internet speed record for me? 19MB/s. 1000BaseFX to OC3.
second best? 16MB/s. 100BaseTX to multi-DS3.
third best? 11MB/s. 100BaseTX to multi-OC3.

current internet speed record holder? I believe 54MB/s.

<< Comment #23 @ 23:18 UTC, 20 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-168.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #22

oh, yes, I forgot. I believe the new record is around 115MB/s, but I don't think that was point to point. If it's the one I'm thinking of, they had a pipe from Sunnyvale to Chicago and then on to Amsterdam. cheap and it doesn't count if you ask me.

<< Comment #28 @ 10:43 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

DeeZnutZ - Reply to #23

yir, but you are 17

<< Comment #30 @ 13:44 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

OverFlouh - Reply to #22

//
second best? 16MB/s. 100BaseTX to multi-DS3.
//

sry, not possible.

<< Comment #40 @ 23:20 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-168.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #30

Sorry, but it is and you obviously don't know anything about computers ot electricity, so please don't post.

<< Comment #50 @ 15:06 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

OverFlouh - Reply to #40

100mbit != 100mb/s

100mbit/8 = 12,5 mb/s but you wont get 12,5mb download speed because you have stuff like protocols etc.

the tx is twisted copper, f sould be fiber. can be wrong at this point though ;)

<< Comment #52 @ 20:25 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

D i M a - Reply to #50

m != M
b != B

<< Comment #53 @ 22:34 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

OverFlouh - Reply to #52

agreed.
but it doesnt make 100tx faster.

whatever, this is quite pointless.

Edited by OverFlouh at 22:37 GMT, 22nd Aug 2003

<< Comment #54 @ 00:17 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-55.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #50

"100mbit != 100mb/s"

100mbit == 100mb/s

100Mbit == 100Mb/s

what does this have to do with my post, moron?

stop quoting your stupidity on petty little things like 'number conversions.' you are pathetic.

"100mbit/8 = 12,5 mb/s but you wont get 12,5mb download speed because you have stuff like protocols etc."

Actually, it is because you are showing how stupid you are. Stop at European. As I said, you know nothing about computers and electricity. So why are you posting, nimrod?
Maybe you'd like to check out IEEE802.3u and find out that 100BaseTX is called BASE because it is a baseband electrical technology and is not limited by any sort of flow control. Or maybe you'd just like to delve in your own stupidity and try to come off as some 'sUPER lEET cOMpuTEER dude,' but I have news for you, no one else on this site knows shit, why should you?.

"the tx is twisted copper, f sould be fiber. can be wrong at this point though ;) "

LOL!O!L!!L BLADES!! ur smairit ckmputer guy can u cum fix my dale?!?!

<< Comment #35 @ 18:55 UTC, 21 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

acid-mea

*fliping*

<< Comment #42 @ 00:43 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Six16

when ive dled something, and then i dl the same thing again, it goes like 25mb/s(not the actual figure), owned!

<< Comment #47 @ 09:33 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

raccoon - Reply to #42

ah, the many miracles of caching

<< Comment #63 @ 23:26 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-20.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #47

wow u r smartid!!!1 lols! cashieng hehe bling bling!!1 lols!!!

<< Comment #46 @ 09:32 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

raccoon

fuckin ace

<< Comment #51 @ 17:04 UTC, 22 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Corpsegrinder

no respect for you for downloading CS-demos [-] !

<< Comment #55 @ 03:09 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #51

I'll make a pic downloading a quake demo allright.

<< Comment #56 @ 03:12 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #51

Here's for you mate.

Edited by wikkkkietman at 03:13 GMT, 23rd Aug 2003

<< Comment #66 @ 11:45 UTC, 24 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Corpsegrinder - Reply to #56

ok, but i'm not jealous becuase i'm used to this downhitting actions in my life :(((

:)

<< Comment #68 @ 12:30 UTC, 24 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #66

Haha lol.

<< Comment #73 @ 13:42 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Corpsegrinder - Reply to #68

yeah, stab into the wound.
bastard

:)

<< Comment #77 @ 10:51 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

deotrip - Reply to #56

[-] for clan arena demo!

<< Comment #57 @ 08:45 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Disarr@y

I would of thought the problem with having such a fast connection would be that finding a dl source fast enough to keep up:D.

Of course with programs like kazza it would be very difficult to get speeds of above 100k/sec?

<< Comment #58 @ 12:56 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

wikkkkietman - Reply to #57

True true, but I'm also on a network with 50 people or so and they load all kinds of shit up, so I have almost all available media in the world.

<< Comment #60 @ 15:19 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

chronoZ- - Reply to #57

nVidia.com is *suposidly* the fastest dl site on the internet.

+ i've had 300k from kazaa b4 ;) depnds on the sources as you say tho :)

<< Comment #62 @ 23:25 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (adsl-78-152-27.cha.bellsouth.net) - Reply to #60

"nVidia.com is *suposidly* the fastest dl site on the internet.
"

uhh?

<< Comment #64 @ 02:24 UTC, 24 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

chronoZ- - Reply to #62

only what i heard..

<< Comment #59 @ 15:17 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

chronoZ-

remember kids, the faster your download, the bigger your penis!

<< Comment #61 @ 19:46 UTC, 23 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Impulse - Reply to #59

hajahahjah

<< Comment #67 @ 11:46 UTC, 24 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Corpsegrinder - Reply to #59

proves that god really gave me a small penis \o(

<< Comment #69 @ 00:30 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (1Cust171.tnt11.stk3.swe.da.uu.net) - Reply to #59

i download at 0.71kbit/sec, or when its cold 1.87kb/sec

<< Comment #65 @ 09:24 UTC, 24 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

Disarr@y

rofl

<< Comment #70 @ 01:34 UTC, 25 August 2003 >>

(Link, Reply)

chronoZ- - Reply to #65

=]]]

<< Comment #76 @ 10:06 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

funnyb

bump'd

<< Comment #95 @ 10:23 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

viaIImaximus - Reply to #76

stop saying bump'd you army person

<< Comment #78 @ 14:13 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

netrex

Pretty nice =)

Attached Image: [email protected] (152KB)

Edited by netrex at 14:14 UTC, 12 July 2007

<< Comment #79 @ 14:48 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

jonte - Reply to #78

hardcore porn pro eh

<< Comment #80 @ 15:14 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

netrex - Reply to #79

:P No, this is my screenshot, not yours :D

<< Comment #82 @ 16:21 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

jonte - Reply to #80

screenshot, cumshot, titshot, whatever. i bet theres a real good reason you censored that pic

<< Comment #83 @ 16:45 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

led - Reply to #82

lol so true.

<< Comment #85 @ 19:09 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

netrex - Reply to #82

That there is :)

<< Comment #81 @ 16:17 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

netrex - Reply to #78

Ok, I lied, well, not really, but it's not my home speed :D :( It's from a LAN I attended last year :)

<< Comment #88 @ 22:38 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anal justice - Reply to #81

i wonder why do u keep that. really

<< Comment #89 @ 23:05 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

netrex - Reply to #88

I store these kinds of screenshots, well, nto these kinds, but when I make a screenshot, I save them in a certain folder, I got folders for anything, and I don't clean them up :P I also got every picture I've ever recieved from anyone on MSN or IRC, sorted in folders with the nicks or names of the senders :P

<< Comment #90 @ 01:44 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anal justice - Reply to #89

sounds like you are born for secretary work. i am currently looking for personal assistant so if you are blond, a little bit smart, have a nice ass, soft skin, your weight is below 50kg and you aren't short aaaand have a vagina, you should consider joining my team :D

the salary depends on your (quake) skills :D

<< Comment #92 @ 07:31 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

netrex - Reply to #90

Blond: a little
A little bit smart: a little
Have a nice ass: a little
Have soft skin: not everywhere
Weight below 50kg: If I was triplets
Not short: not really
Have a vagina: No, and not accessible either

Sorry, it seems I don't fit the profile :P

<< Comment #99 @ 13:47 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Lethe - Reply to #90

below 50 kg? i dont find anorexic girls attractive...

<< Comment #100 @ 16:22 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anal justice - Reply to #99

and i am not looking for your secretary...

<< Comment #104 @ 10:48 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Lethe - Reply to #100

ok dude, bones all the way...

<< Comment #105 @ 12:30 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anal justice - Reply to #104

S.W.I.N.E.

<< Comment #107 @ 15:02 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Lethe - Reply to #105

wait, i got it. you are 5ft tall, and youre looking for a 5 ft girl. thats ok, 50kgs.

over, out, whatever. no reply.

<< Comment #110 @ 16:51 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anal justice - Reply to #107

i dont measure height in feet :)

<< Comment #114 @ 11:42 UTC, 18 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

luKrek - Reply to #99

mrs luKrek is 43KG and not anorexic. pwnd

<< Comment #115 @ 18:19 UTC, 18 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Lethe - Reply to #114

mrs lukrek title really confused me...

<< Comment #118 @ 08:21 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

luKrek - Reply to #115

well I'd be Mr and the Mrs would be the Mrs

<< Comment #119 @ 13:13 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

noctis - Reply to #118

oh damn, i thought you are both :/

Edited by noctis at 17:53 UTC, 19 July 2007

<< Comment #120 @ 16:41 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

luKrek - Reply to #119

my both?

<< Comment #122 @ 17:54 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

noctis - Reply to #120

sry, edited.

<< Comment #126 @ 06:14 UTC, 20 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

luKrek - Reply to #122

-are, +were

<< Comment #127 @ 07:10 UTC, 20 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

noctis - Reply to #126

ffs, whatever xD

<< Comment #84 @ 17:11 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

crack

i download from ati.com with 8,7 megabyte/sec.
SO WHAT'S THE FUCKIN POINT?

<< Comment #87 @ 22:24 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anyk3y - Reply to #84

the point is .. he´s been doing it since 2003 :P

<< Comment #86 @ 21:33 UTC, 12 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

mammon

I was gonna suggest to nuke Sweden earlier but lets nuke Suriname instead!

<< Comment #93 @ 09:02 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Khorney - Reply to #86

Better yet, let sweden nuked Suriname!

<< Comment #91 @ 02:54 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (tor-exit.aof.su)

and 10MB/s is still as slow now as it was then. this is 2007. 100Mbps is ~1997.

<< Comment #94 @ 10:00 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Lukas

Guess you're a babemagnet then

<< Comment #96 @ 11:08 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

rahzei

some goon on some site
[img1]

Edited by rahzei at 11:09 UTC, 13 July 2007

<< Comment #98 @ 13:45 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Lethe - Reply to #96

jesus

<< Comment #102 @ 16:35 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anal justice - Reply to #96

i guess a few of the seeders are in your own physical network :)

<< Comment #103 @ 19:58 UTC, 13 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

rahzei - Reply to #102

apparently he's on gbit

(its not me, i wish tho 8( )

<< Comment #106 @ 13:20 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

Anonymous (tor-exit.aof.su) - Reply to #102

why? gigabit has been around forever. it's not really very impressive. not bad though, but even OC-3 was around well before then and you could get a good ~17-18MB/s (or something like that). of course most OC-3s and so forth were used in datacenters and core networks or what have you. which uh.. doesn't really mean that no one could have gotten 20MB/s on a residential connection 7 or 8 years ago, either, so long as the internal network was wired up with gigabit fiber.

<< Comment #108 @ 15:34 UTC, 14 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

oldskL

niceness

<< Comment #121 @ 16:50 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

sudstah

who doesnt download at megs a second? i know i do

<< Comment #123 @ 20:56 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

anyk3y - Reply to #121

who doesnt check post dates before posting? i know i do ;)

<< Comment #125 @ 01:54 UTC, 20 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

sudstah - Reply to #123

it was posted in 2003 so what! and u still posted!?

Edited by Exe at 01:54 UTC, 20 July 2007

<< Comment #124 @ 23:35 UTC, 19 July 2007 >>

(Link, Reply)

egd

this since 2003 or something....
http://img507.imageshack.us/my.php?image=12mbqw3.jpg

Reply to:
[Reset] Format:

Formatting:

Content:

Are you a bot?

Or if you already have an account:

Username:

Password:

Read the Posting Guidelines

Non-HTML tags: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlined[/u]
[small]small[/small], [q]quoted[/q], [s]~~strikethrough~~[/s]
[url=www.url.com]link[/url] or type www.url.com
[flag=country] (list), [avatar=name] (list)
[map=mapname gamename] (list)

Conceived and created by Sujoy Roy (Legal Notices)
RSS Feed Information, Link Buttons and Banners