| x being the year the first theory was proposed [1800; 1899]
Heartlesss
madbringer
Your claim -> less than 1 per year, so his claim fails
His claim -> 33 conspiracy theories have turned out to be true
Your claim -> less than 1 per year, so his claim fails
His claim: 33/x = 33
Your claim: 1 * 33 = 33 does not mean 1 * 34 = 34
So you admit that your post was dead weight?
You claimed that he failed, but brought no offering as to why?[q]
that is correct.
I let that one open so other can think for themselves about what I was trying to say.
Of course, such things only work if people think "assuming he has a point, what could he have been getting at?
With you being you, and it being my post, I think it's safe to say you went like this "assuming he is wrong, for what question would his result be wrong". Kinda obvious that you'll end up with a wrong result ;)
Even though it did mean you had to ignore the information I gave in the first line.
(Hint: I was going in the direction of what I believe is the motive for r1ddler to post that link/list here)
[q]You spent the time to calculate out useless information,
and even tried to defend it when the data was challenged?
I let that one open so other can think for themselves about what I was trying to say.
Of course, such things only work if people think "assuming he has a point, what could he have been getting at?
With you being you, and it being my post, I think it's safe to say you went like this "assuming he is wrong, for what question would his result be wrong". Kinda obvious that you'll end up with a wrong result ;)
Even though it did mean you had to ignore the information I gave in the first line.
A site of conspiracy theorists proudly presents reasons that less than once every 3 three years they get one right.
If there were only 2 conspiracy theories that year, that's a 33% chance of ANY conspiracy being correct
![shaftwhores only by [EXE]dann](/files/avatars/2007/51852-shaftwhore.gif "shaftwhores only by [EXE]dann"){kind=small}
