Posted @ 10:04 GMT 2 Mar 2021
Here with ryzen+580, 1080p: apex 90-110 (768p for 144fps, but it works better on

Posted @ 18:57 GMT 1 Mar 2021
pubg/apex bad, ow and valorant good (not so sure about the second). fortnite pr

Posted @ 15:42 GMT 28 Feb 2021
In 1999 q3 engine was the new standard for the industry, qc engine in 2017 was a

Posted @ 12:15 GMT 19 Feb 2021
+ brutal fate (by brutal doom team)

Posted @ 13:26 GMT 6 Feb 2021
today automatic download is a standard, but in 2005/06 very rare

Posted @ 00:08 GMT 12 Jan 2021
It's not marketing problem only. Qc peak has been 17k players during shitesda e

Posted @ 12:07 GMT 11 Jan 2021
They have it, 2-3k fans vs double-digit millions of cod/bf/csgo/ow/apex players

Posted @ 17:39 GMT 25 Dec 2020
4k@120 or more hz for what lol

Posted @ 20:47 GMT 22 Dec 2020
There are better colors/contrast in almost all va/ips panels than tn but some mo

Posted @ 00:50 GMT 21 Dec 2020
There are some ips/va fast panels now, check reviews on tftcentral

Posted @ 12:04 GMT 10 Dec 2020
Dont they already have a salary to stay in qpl/streaming qc?

Posted @ 22:25 GMT 4 Dec 2020
Maybe modding and graphic personalization/cfg, except for the hud (dbc uses a gr

Posted @ 17:37 GMT 3 Dec 2020
Dunno if making qc more popular would be a good thing for afps. Sure better tha

Posted @ 20:09 GMT 15 Nov 2020
In benchmarks yes, huge jump. In daily use, 29.5s loading time vs 30, lmao

Posted @ 19:57 GMT 11 Oct 2020
I would say 240hz tn monitors for quake, but there are some fast 240-280hz ips m

Posted @ 09:55 GMT 10 Oct 2020
300 € max? For a good gaming experience you can find some 24-25" 1080p 240hz tn

Posted @ 09:33 GMT 10 Oct 2020
RIP :(

Posted @ 09:43 GMT 2 Oct 2020
I guess my sens is correct, same value as ql, just the .018 ql yaw converted to

Posted @ 20:34 GMT 1 Oct 2020
dbt ramp ("dbt accel") = QL accel / QL sens * dbt yaw/1.32 right? And what

Posted @ 14:54 GMT 30 Sep 2020
In any recent review on tftcentral you find the response time/input lag test res