game easier

No but I am tempted to buy Dell S2716DG to review.

U buy you test and you send back to get refund? Horror client...

No? I keep or ebay, unless it's broken lol.

just use adaptive sync, don`t know if AMD cards have it, but it fixes rage`s monster tearing no matter what speed you are going

adaptive sync can be used on any monitor, you just enable it in 3d settings in nvidia control panel

adaptive sync works without massive fps drops, if you still have tearing, then you have to have a rubbish LCD monitor or the response time is 5ms +

adaptive sync is still a pile of crap compared to free/G-sync, when it comes to inputlag.

it does`nt matter, its more todo with the bandwidth of displayport

i cant be bothered to find all the info, displayport has more bandwidth and a lot lower latency then hdmi and dvi to carry HD -> 4k images

http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/hdmi-vs-displaypo...to-choose/

what does that have to do with adaptive sync?
adaptive sync has about the same inputlag as v-sync does, so nobody could use either of it in competetive games, if he cared for his performace(i couldn't even stand it in single player games at all).

most peoples input lag is probably more twats with bottlenecking of cables, then any other actually horror

it's no error to gain inputlag with v-/adaptive sync, but the unavoidable logic with how these things work.

get tomshardware to benchmark them up, hexus is too thick

already some jizz http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/graphics-...739-6.html

not sure if you're not actually trolling.
If you use the best method to connect the monitor, then you will still have more inputlag with v-/adaptive sync enabled, compared to it being off.

get a cheap mouse and put pre-render frames up 2 or 4 and you wont norice any difference

i have nothing to add.

word, gfx displayport to dvi would probably bottleneck, because the max recommended display is only on the cable specs but monitors firmeares always suck so you can have any resolution into any port if you just have an adaptor

guessing monitors and gfx cards become analog when using differents ports at each end

Doesn't change anything for fast fpses since you want to play at high fixed framerate and the screen will always be at max hz rate.
gsync/freesync is only useful for games that will run at lower than ~100 fps, to make them look smoother

not really, if you want them to look smoother you need the extra bandwidth of the displayport to displayport

sync just sends a frame every 1 hz, so frames arn`t repeated and then causes tearing, which is when a frame looks like :

http://mygaming.co.za/news/wp-content/uploads...earing.png

g-sync and freesync are just different on how they wait for the reply for the card to send another

I have an Acer Predator z35 Gsync.

Gsync is amazing for all games, even quake. But in Quake you have to force maxfps 120, otherwise there is massive input lag. At 120 there is no noticeable input lag. This has been also noted on many reviews I read online and experienced first hand. So no 250fps.. But still 120hz 120fps Gsync feels smoother than 250fps no vsync.

Basically in Quake it just makes it easier on the eyes because of the zero tearing. In other games its amazing because of how the Hz changes for lower FPS etc.

Hrm I disagree, I've found 250 fps feels smoother but I'm also using 144hz

I got the Acer XB240HA with g-sync, and prefer g-sync even in QL, with the fps capped at 140fps using an external program for this(MSI on-screen display).

and i agree what storm wrote about the advantages.

G-Sync adds input delay if you have >~140fps. No go for twitch shooters imo. Solveable if you stick with maxfps ~125 though, but I like more fps more, I guess its pretty subjective.

Read more here: http://www.blurbusters.com/gsync/preview2/

what settings do you use for quake?

(fps, hz, g-sync or not... etc)

250fps 144hz no sync

He's DA B0mb with it. Should have new years eve $ cup I donate 10$

Yes, best solution. With picmiped into oblivion you don't even notice screen tearing.

they are talking ass, 1000mhz usb polling rate is 1ms of latency, with 1ms response time on your monitor there should be no input lag, the only thing that might have input lag is if you have a 10,000 dpi laser mouse

I'm sorry, but it seems like you are the person talking ass for an unknown reason.

Don't bother replying plz, ignored.

your going to have 1ms input with or without any sync, its called latency that will always exist until fibre connections are used for everything on normal computers

if you actually think 1ms gets your killed your just shit

Actualy fiber is not needed, not sure if troll but copper can go at an extremly high frequency. 1000Hz is nothing for copper. If you have 1ms latency its because of the way the mouse system work. The system will check every 1ms the position of the mouse. While with USB3 there is possibility for other options (not using pooling rate but asynchronous etc...), still with copper.

asynchronous can just send 2 channels of data at the same time, or as many channels the bandwidth can cope with and how good a coder you are, the latency is still 1ms on windows, because its all windows can handle because its not a real-time operating system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_operating_system

it would take microsoft another 30 years to make windows a real-time OS, you would need to find a linux OS, which steam and nVidia will probably have 1 day running real-time

https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200...developers

http://store.steampowered.com/steamos/

troll

depends, laser mice probably send 2 packets for every 1 packet your buttons send, so you might turn a few extra frames, shoot and miss

I read many articles about monitors and techs and made same conclusion - no *sync for QL needed. But here I wanna know any practical opinion like storm said here
http://www.esreality.com/post/2790721/#pid2790855
Will try someday may be. But I'm happy with my 1080p@200Hz.

I tried that too, and while not doing it for an extensive amount of time all I felt was that my hitscan aim became a littlebit worse. But it might have just been placebo too..

How do u get 1080p at 200Hz? I heard some monitors are gonna make 200+Hz soon but i dont remember the names.

need a 4k tv, top end tvs refresh at 600hz

bad troll attempt

http://www.homefuninc.com/60hz-vs-120hz-vs-24...heat-sheet

http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/ultra-hd-4k-tv-refresh-rates/

http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2458